4 Comments
User's avatar
raymengl's avatar

Couple of your 2024/25 tables have Aberdeen and Dundee Utd, and Hearts and Motherwell in the wrong final positions?

Expand full comment
Scotland's Coefficient's avatar

Ah cheers mate, must have uploaded the wrong graphic for those two. The VAR costs and the bigger table that includes UEFA money?

That should be updated now, thanks for pointing out

Expand full comment
Adam Allan's avatar

Rangers with far more coeff points yet doesn't seem to change their earnings. So I ask, what's the point in trying to advance the Scottish coeff? Shouldn't a club who make all that difference receive more?

Would like to see expenditures against earnings in uefa for the top 2 (Celtic and Rangers) - Flights, accommodations, meals/beverages, training facilities, wages etc. How would the earnings look then?

Would also like to see a full earnings with ticket sales, tv rights, (all monies earned) against expenditures (wages, running costs etc) though I dare say this would be too big a feat.

Just a thought.

Even better if you could do the entire top flight in Scotland. Just to show the struggles of say Ross Cty to the likes of Celtic.

Expand full comment
StevenM's avatar

A very interesting proposal for re-distribution model. I like it but absolutely no chance of happening mind you when top two aren't currently guaranteed UEFA league stages in competitions they'd be aspiring to. Although the flip side would be bettering the others could help raise that 'guarantee' in future years as you've pointed out.

Still strange to me that league split accepted by clubs when in the last ten years (COVID 19/20 season excluded), on average, 6 points separated fifth from seventh. With 15 points available, zero chance of achieving what could amount to an extra £1.1 million, based on figures from 23/24 league and UEFA totals.

Expand full comment